This is the Decision Readiness Guide page.
We were not able to identify your decision from the link you followed.
You can return to the Decision Diagnostic, or review an example Decision Readiness Guide below.
Make a very good Example Decision
HIGH LEVEL SUMMARY
Do we know what we are deciding?: Critical / blocking
Have concerns been raised and resolved?: Weak, with gaps
Do we have what we need to decide?: Mostly in place
Can we bring ourselves to decide?: Mostly in place
Scope of this review
This first pass looked only at the decision-level factors that apply regardless of the option chosen or steps following decision-making. It did not assess whether any specific option will work, which option is better, or how executable the decision is.
Broader scope and areas of further de-risking may be looked at in the next steps if you choose.
Below are the main highlights of the Decision Readiness Guide. More details are available in the extended version.
This first pass looked only at the decision-level factors that apply regardless of the option chosen or steps following decision-making. It did not assess whether any specific option will work, which option is better, or how executable the decision is.
Broader scope and areas of further de-risking may be looked at in the next steps if you choose.
Below are the main highlights of the Decision Readiness Guide. More details are available in the extended version.
THE BREAKDOWN
Do we know what we are deciding?
Critical / blocking
- Some of the options, selection criteria, assumptions, and unknowns are not clearly laid out or explicitly acknowledged.
Also observed: no clear selection criteria.
What good shape would look like
The options, selection criteria, assumptions, and unknowns are clearly laid out and explicitly acknowledged, the options are distinct, and there is a clear way to evaluate them.
Have concerns been raised and resolved?
Weak, with gaps
- The decision did not go through strong enough independent and thorough critique.
Also observed: escalation not working; concerns not safe to raise.
What good shape would look like
The decision has been independently and meaningfully critiqued, important points (such as assumptions, risks, or alternative views) have been fully examined, and issues can be safely raised via available channels and effectively resolved.
Do we have what we need to decide?
Mostly in place
- The consequences of this decision are not clearly articulated or sufficiently understood.
Also observed: limited range of perspectives.
What good shape would look like
The information is clear and reliable, can be shaped into coherent options, and the consequences are clearly articulated and sufficiently understood.
Can we bring ourselves to decide?
Mostly in place
- There is weak follow-through commitment behind the decision.
Also observed: unequal individual risk.
What good shape would look like
Decision authority is clear, and there is strong enough follow-through commitment behind the decision.
FACTORS NOT ASSESSED IN THIS RUN
Only decision-level factors were assessed; option-specific or execution-related factors were explicitly out of scope for now.
Broader scope and areas of further de-risking may be looked at in the next steps if you choose.
These were the main highlights of the Decision Readiness Guide, more detailed version is also available.
NEXT STEPS
Option 1:
Address what's missing on your own, then make a decision
You want to close the remaining gaps yourself.
You can have this check sent to you by email and save it to be able to return later.
You want to close the remaining gaps yourself.
You can have this check sent to you by email and save it to be able to return later.
Option 2:
You want more support working through what's still blocking the decision.
How this works (structural, formal, research-grounded and not written for most humans)
The Second Look Framework is a decision readiness framework that helps founders and decision makers verify whether an important decision is ready before committing.
The Second Look Framework evaluates decisions across the stages of Recognition, Decision Diagnostic, Decision Readiness Guide, and Decision Resolution.
Decision Readiness Guide interprets the output of a Decision Diagnostic.
It explains what “readiness” means in this framework and how to understand
the result of the diagnostic check.
Readiness indicates whether the minimum conditions required to make a decision
are present. It does not imply optimality, correctness, or absence of risk.
This guide does not prescribe actions or recommend next steps.
It exists to clarify status, not to resolve the decision.
The Second Look Framework evaluates decisions across the stages of Recognition, Decision Diagnostic, Decision Readiness Guide, and Decision Resolution.
Decision Readiness Guide interprets the output of a Decision Diagnostic.
It explains what “readiness” means in this framework and how to understand
the result of the diagnostic check.
Readiness indicates whether the minimum conditions required to make a decision
are present. It does not imply optimality, correctness, or absence of risk.
This guide does not prescribe actions or recommend next steps.
It exists to clarify status, not to resolve the decision.